Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Kyu Sang Lee"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Review
Programmed cell death-ligand 1 assessment in urothelial carcinoma: prospect and limitation
Kyu Sang Lee, Gheeyoung Choe
J Pathol Transl Med. 2021;55(3):163-170.   Published online April 7, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2021.02.22
  • 3,340 View
  • 138 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibition has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Several PD-L1 assays are conducted to formulate appropriate treatment decisions for PD-1/PD-L1 target therapy in UC. However, each assay has its own specific requirement of antibody clones, staining platforms, scoring algorithms, and cutoffs for the determination of PD-L1 status. These prove to be challenging constraints to pathology laboratories and pathologists. Thus, the present article comprehensively demonstrates the scoring algorithm used and differences observed in each assay (22C3, SP142, and SP263). Interestingly, the SP142 score algorithm considers only immune cells and not tumor cells (TCs). It remains controversial whether SP142 expressed only in TCs truly accounts for a negative PD-L1 case. Moreover, the scoring algorithm of each assay is complex and divergent, which can result in inter-observer heterogeneity. In this regard, the development of artificial intelligence for providing assistance to pathologists in obtaining more accurate and objective results has been actively researched. To facilitate efficiency of PD-L1 testing, several previous studies attempted to integrate and harmonize each assay in UC. The performance comparison of the various PD-L1 assays demonstrated in previous studies was encouraging, the exceptional concordance rate reported between 22C3 and SP263. Although these two assays may be used interchangeably, a clinically validated algorithm for each agent must be applied.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Aspectos prácticos sobre la determinación de PD-L1 en el tratamiento de carcinoma urotelial. Consenso del grupo de uropatología de la SEAP
    Antonio López-Beltrán, Pilar González-Peramato, Julián Sanz-Ortega, Juan Daniel Prieto Cuadra, Isabel Trias, Rafael J. Luque Barona, María Eugenia Semidey, Pablo Maroto, Ferran Algaba
    Revista Española de Patología.2023; 56(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • Systemic treatment of advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer: The landscape in Australia
    Howard Gurney, Timothy D. Clay, Niara Oliveira, Shirley Wong, Ben Tran, Carole Harris
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 19(6): 585.     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 Testing in Urothelial Carcinoma: Analysis of a Series of 1401 Cases Using Both the 22C3 and SP142 Assays
    Harriet Evans, Brendan O’Sullivan, Frances Hughes, Kathryn Charles, Lee Robertson, Philippe Taniere, Salvador Diaz-Cano
    Pathology and Oncology Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Insights on recent innovations in bladder cancer immunotherapy
    Mohamed A. Abd El‐Salam, Claire E.P. Smith, Chong‐Xian Pan
    Cancer Cytopathology.2022; 130(9): 667.     CrossRef
  • What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review. Part 1: Focus on Immunohistochemical Results with Discussion of Pre-Analytical and Interpretation Variables
    Andrea Palicelli, Martina Bonacini, Stefania Croci, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Sofia Cañete-Portillo, Alcides Chaux, Alessandra Bisagni, Eleonora Zanetti, Dario De Biase, Beatrice Melli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Moira Ragazzi, Maria Paola Bonasoni, Alessandra
    Cells.2021; 10(11): 3166.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Stromal Expression of MicroRNA-21 in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients with Distant Metastases
Kyu Sang Lee, Soo Kyung Nam, Jiwon Koh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Gheeyoung Choe, Woo Ho Kim, Hye Seung Lee
J Pathol Transl Med. 2016;50(4):270-277.   Published online May 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2016.03.19
  • 8,188 View
  • 94 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
The aim of this study was to determine the regional heterogeneity and clinicopathological significance of microRNA-21 (miR-21) in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with distant metastasis.
Methods
miR-21 expression was investigated by using locked nucleic acid– fluorescence in situ hybridization in the center and periphery of the primary cancer and in distant metastasis from 170 patients with advanced CRC. In addition, α-smooth muscle actin and desmin were evaluated to identify cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) by using immunohistochemistry.
Results
The miR-21 signal was observed in the cancer stroma. The expression of miR-21 (a score of 1–4) in the center and periphery of the primary cancer and in distant metastasis was observed in specimens from 133 (78.2%), 105 (61.8%), and 91 (53.5%) patients, respectively. miR-21 expression was heterogeneous in advanced CRC. Discordance between miR-21 expression in the center of the primary cancer and either the periphery of the primary cancer or distant metastasis was 31.7% or 44.7%, respectively. miR-21 stromal expression in the periphery of the primary cancer was significantly associated with a better prognosis (p=.004). miR-21 expression was significantly associated with CAFs in the center of the primary cancer (p=.001) and distant metastases (p=.041).
Conclusions
miR-21 expression is observed in cancer stroma related to the CAF quantity and frequently presents regional heterogeneity in CRC. Our findings indicate that the role of miR-21 in predicting prognosis may be controversial but provide a new perspective of miR-21 level measurement in cancer specimens.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Expression of Selected miRNAs in Normal and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and in BxPc3 and MIA PaCa-2 Cell Lines of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Václav Mandys, Alexey Popov, Robert Gürlich, Jan Havránek, Lucie Pfeiferová, Michal Kolář, Jana Vránová, Karel Smetana, Lukáš Lacina, Pavol Szabo
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(4): 3617.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNAs and colorectal cancer: clinical potential and regulatory networks
    George Yiadom Osei, Joseph Adu-Amankwaah, Selina Koomson, Solomon Beletaa, Emmanuel Akomanin Asiamah, Cecilia Smith-Togobo, Siti Razila Abdul Razak
    Molecular Biology Reports.2023; 50(11): 9575.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA-552 expression in colorectal cancer and its clinicopathological significance
    Joon Im, Soo Kyung Nam, Hye Seung Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2021; 55(2): 125.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative changes in plasma miR21‐5p as a novel biomarker for colorectal cancer recurrence: A prospective study
    Masahiro Fukada, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Takao Takahashi, Nobuhiko Sugito, Kazuki Heishima, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Yukihiro Akao
    Cancer Science.2021; 112(10): 4270.     CrossRef
  • Differential expression of microRNAs in colorectal cancer: Different patterns between isolated cancer gland and stromal cells
    Ayaka Sato, Yasuko Fujita, Koki Otsuka, Akira Sasaki, Hiromu Suzuki, Takayuki Matsumoto, Tamotsu Sugai
    Pathology International.2020; 70(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • High-Throughput Multiplex Immunohistochemical Imaging of the Tumor and Its Microenvironment
    Jiwon Koh, Yoonjin Kwak, Jin Kim, Woo Ho Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(1): 98.     CrossRef
  • Tumor Tissue MIR92a and Plasma MIRs21 and 29a as Predictive Biomarkers Associated with Clinicopathological Features and Surgical Resection in a Prospective Study on Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Masahiro Fukada, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Takao Takahashi, Nobuhiko Sugito, Kazuki Heishima, Yukihiro Akao, Kazuhiro Yoshida
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(8): 2509.     CrossRef
  • The promising role of noncoding RNAs in cancer-associated fibroblasts: an overview of current status and future perspectives
    Zengli Fang, Jin Xu, Bo Zhang, Wei Wang, Jiang Liu, Chen Liang, Jie Hua, Qingcai Meng, Xianjun Yu, Si Shi
    Journal of Hematology & Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Altered miR-21, miRNA-148a Expression in Relation to KRAS Mutation Status as Indicator of Adenoma-Carcinoma Transitional Pattern in Colorectal Adenoma and Carcinoma Lesions
    Somayeh Igder, Javad Mohammadiasl, Pooneh Mokarram
    Biochemical Genetics.2019; 57(6): 767.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of an Easy-to-Implement, Practical Algorithm for the Identification of Molecular Subtypes of Gastric Cancer: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
    Jiwon Koh, Keun-Wook Lee, Soo Kyung Nam, An Na Seo, Ji-Won Kim, Jin Won Kim, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Woo Ho Kim, Hye Seung Lee
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(12): e1321.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Utility of Histological Growth Patterns of Colorectal Lung Oligometastasis
    Son Jae Yeong, Min Gyoung Pak, Hyoun Wook Lee, Seung Yeon Ha, Mee Sook Roh
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2018; 52(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • Effect of dietary components on miRNA and colorectal carcinogenesis
    Adewale Oluwaseun Fadaka, Babajide A. Ojo, Olusola Bolaji Adewale, Temitope Esho, Ashley Pretorius
    Cancer Cell International.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ligand-Independent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Overexpression Correlates with Poor Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer
    Sumi Yun, Yoonjin Kwak, Soo Kyung Nam, An Na Seo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Hye Seung Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(4): 1351.     CrossRef
  • Mutation analysis of CTNNB1 gene and the ras pathway genes KRAS , NRAS , BRAF , and PIK3CA in eyelid sebaceous carcinomas
    Mi Jung Kwon, Eun Sook Nam, Seong Jin Cho, Hye-Rim Park, Soo Kee Min, Jinwon Seo, Ji-Young Choe
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2017; 213(6): 654.     CrossRef
  • Exosomal miRNAs and miRNA dysregulation in cancer-associated fibroblasts
    Fengming Yang, Zhiqiang Ning, Ling Ma, Weitao Liu, Chuchu Shao, Yongqian Shu, Hua Shen
    Molecular Cancer.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic implications of immune classification by PD-L1 expression and CD8-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in stage II and III gastric cancer patients
    Jiwon Koh, Chan-Young Ock, Jin Won Kim, Soo Kyung Nam, Yoonjin Kwak, Sumi Yun, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Woo Ho Kim, Hye Seung Lee
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(16): 26356.     CrossRef
Expression of c-MET in Invasive Meningioma
Sumi Yun, Jae Moon Koh, Kyu Sang Lee, An Na Seo, Kyung Han Nam, Gheeyoung Choe
J Pathol Transl Med. 2015;49(1):44-51.   Published online January 15, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2014.10.13
  • 9,122 View
  • 67 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
Meningiomas show high recurrence rates even after curative tumor removal. The invasiveness of meningiomas may contribute to their high recurrence rates. Recently, c-MET and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) have been reported to be involved in cancer invasion. Methods: We examined the immunohistochemical expression of c-MET and HGF in 100 cases of patients with meningiomas who have undergone complete tumor removal. Results: c-MET-High and HGFHigh were found in 17% and 13% of meningiomas, respectively. Brain invasion was observed in 17.6% of c-MET-High meningiomas, but in only 2.4% of c-MET-Low meningiomas (p=.033). Bone/ soft tissue invasion was observed in 23.5% of c-MET-High meningiomas and in 9.6% of c-MET-Low meningiomas (p=.119). HGF-High did not show statistical association with brain invasion or bone/ soft tissue invasion. c-MET-High demonstrated shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS, 93.5±8.2 months vs 96.1±1.9 months); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=.139). There was no association of HGF-High with RFS. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that c- MET-High is associated with brain invasion of meningiomas, and that c-MET expression may be a useful predictive marker for meningioma recurrence. Patients with invasive meningiomas with high expressions of c-MET may be good candidates for targeted therapy using c-MET inhibitors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Drug target therapy and emerging clinical relevance of exosomes in meningeal tumors
    Swati Sharma, Rashmi Rana, Prem Prakash, Nirmal Kumar Ganguly
    Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.2024; 479(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of preoperative MRI features in the diagnosis of meningioma WHO grade and brain invasion
    Jun Jiang, Juan Yu, Xiajing Liu, Kan Deng, Kaichao Zhuang, Fan Lin, Liangping Luo
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Pharmacotherapy in Treatment of Meningioma: A Systematic Review
    Ataollah Shahbandi, Darsh S. Shah, Caroline C. Hadley, Akash J. Patel
    Cancers.2023; 15(2): 483.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the systemic therapy for recurrent meningiomas and the challenges ahead
    Yi Li, Jan Drappatz
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2023; 23(11): 995.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and pathological impact of an optimal assessment of brain invasion for grade 2 meningioma diagnosis: lessons from a series of 291 cases
    Thiébaud Picart, Chloé Dumot, Jacques Guyotat, Vladislav Pavlov, Nathalie Streichenberger, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Tanguy Fenouil, Anne Durand, Emmanuel Jouanneau, François Ducray, Timothée Jacquesson, Moncef Berhouma, David Meyronet
    Neurosurgical Review.2022; 45(4): 2797.     CrossRef
  • Nomogram based on MRI can preoperatively predict brain invasion in meningioma
    Jing Zhang, Yuntai Cao, Guojin Zhang, Zhiyong Zhao, Jianqing Sun, Wenyi Li, Jialiang Ren, Tao Han, Junlin Zhou, Kuntao Chen
    Neurosurgical Review.2022; 45(6): 3729.     CrossRef
  • Overexpression of Hepatocyte growth factor and its soluble receptor (s-cMet) in the serum of patients with different grades of meningioma
    Farhad Mashayekhi, Soheila Talesh Sasani, Alia Saberi, Zivar Salehi
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2021; 93: 1.     CrossRef
  • Brain-invasive meningiomas: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic options
    Chaoying Qin, Meng Huang, Yimin Pan, Yuzhe Li, Wenyong Long, Qing Liu
    Brain Tumor Pathology.2021; 38(3): 156.     CrossRef
  • YAP1-FAM118B Fusion Defines a Rare Subset of Childhood and Young Adulthood Meningiomas
    Kathleen M. Schieffer, Vibhuti Agarwal, Stephanie LaHaye, Katherine E. Miller, Daniel C. Koboldt, Tara Lichtenberg, Kristen Leraas, Patrick Brennan, Benjamin J. Kelly, Erin Crist, Jerome Rusin, Jonathan L. Finlay, Diana S. Osorio, Eric A. Sribnick, Jeffre
    American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2021; 45(3): 329.     CrossRef
  • Regression of Intracranial Meningiomas Following Treatment with Cabozantinib
    Rupesh Kotecha, Raees Tonse, Haley Appel, Yazmin Odia, Ritesh R. Kotecha, Guilherme Rabinowits, Minesh P. Mehta
    Current Oncology.2021; 28(2): 1537.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of brain invasion in meningiomas: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Satoshi Nakasu, Yoko Nakasu
    Brain Tumor Pathology.2021; 38(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Curcumin Inhibits HGF-Induced EMT by Regulating c-MET-Dependent PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathways in Meningioma
    Xiaodong Chen, Fen Tian, Peng Lun, Yugong Feng, Ho Lin
    Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor. Preoperative seizures as predictive sign of brain invasion by meningioma
    Mikhail F. Chernov
    Journal of Neurosurgery.2019; 130(3): 1030.     CrossRef
  • Investigating Trk Protein Expression between Oropharyngeal and Non-oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Implications and Possible Roles of Human Papillomavirus Infection
    Yoon Ah Cho, Ji Myung Chung, Hyunmi Ryu, Eun Kyung Kim, Byoung Chul Cho, Sun Och Yoon
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 1052.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of brain invasion in patients with meningiomas using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging
    Alborz Adeli, Katharina Hess, Christian Mawrin, Eileen Maria Susanne Streckert, Walter Stummer, Werner Paulus, André Kemmling, Markus Holling, Walter Heindel, Rene Schmidt, Dorothee Cäcilia Spille, Peter B. Sporns, Benjamin Brokinkel
    Oncotarget.2018; 9(89): 35974.     CrossRef
  • Visceral and bone metastases of a WHO grade 2 meningioma: A case report and review of the literature
    A. Paix, W. Waissi, D. Antoni, R. Adeduntan, G. Noël
    Cancer/Radiothérapie.2017; 21(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • Letter: Brain Invasion in Meningiomas—Sex-Associated Differences are not Related to Estrogen- and Progesterone Receptor Expression
    Katharina Heß, Dorothee Cäcilia Spille, Andrea Wagner, Walter Stummer, Werner Paulus, Benjamin Brokinkel
    Neurosurgery.2017; 81(2): E25.     CrossRef
  • Brain invasion in meningiomas—clinical considerations and impact of neuropathological evaluation: a systematic review
    Benjamin Brokinkel, Katharina Hess, Christian Mawrin
    Neuro-Oncology.2017; 19(10): 1298.     CrossRef
  • Systemic therapy for recurrent meningioma
    E. Le Rhun, S. Taillibert, M. C. Chamberlain
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2016; 16(8): 889.     CrossRef
  • Brain Invasion in Meningiomas: Incidence and Correlations with Clinical Variables and Prognosis
    Dorothee Cäcilia Spille, Katharina Heß, Cristina Sauerland, Nader Sanai, Walter Stummer, Werner Paulus, Benjamin Brokinkel
    World Neurosurgery.2016; 93: 346.     CrossRef
Brief Case Report
Intracranial Extracerebral Glioneuronal Heterotopia with Adipose Tissue and a Glioependymal Cyst: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Hwa Jin Cho, Han Na Kim, Kyung Ju Kim, Kyu Sang Lee, Jae Kyung Myung, Seung-Ki Kim, Sung-Hye Park
Korean J Pathol. 2014;48(3):254-257.   Published online June 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.3.254
  • 6,908 View
  • 73 Download
  • 4 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Giant supra and retrosellar glioependymal cyst presenting with only precocious puberty. Clinical study and review of the literature
    Hassan Kadri, Mazen Dughly, Mohamad Shehadeh Agha, Ghiath Hamed, Raed Abouharb, Rostom Mackieh
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 116: 109360.     CrossRef
  • Combined neuroendoscopic cyst wall fenestration and cyst-peritoneal shunt in an infant with glioependymal cyst
    Kohei Irie, Takafumi Shimogawa, Nobutaka Mukae, Daisuke Kuga, Toru Iwaki, Masahiro Mizoguchi, Koji Yoshimoto
    Surgical Neurology International.2022; 13: 102.     CrossRef
  • Cerebellar Glioependymal Cyst
    El Kim
    Brain Tumor Research and Treatment.2021; 9(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Intracranial glioependymal (neuroglial) cysts: a systematic review
    Luis A. Robles, Jesus M. Paez, Dafne Ayala, Bernardo Boleaga-Duran
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2018; 160(7): 1439.     CrossRef
Original Article
Immunohistochemical Classification of Primary and Secondary Glioblastomas
Kyu Sang Lee, Gheeyoung Choe, Kyung Han Nam, An Na Seo, Sumi Yun, Kyung Ju Kim, Hwa Jin Cho, Sung Hye Park
Korean J Pathol. 2013;47(6):541-548.   Published online December 24, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.541
  • 7,046 View
  • 51 Download
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background

Glioblastomas may develop de novo (primary glioblastomas, P-GBLs) or through progression from lower-grade astrocytomas (secondary glioblastomas, S-GBLs). The aim of this study was to compare the immunohistochemical classification of glioblastomas with clinically determined P-GBLs and S-GBLs to identify the best combination of antibodies for immunohistochemical classification.

Methods

We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH-1) in 150 glioblastoma cases.

Results

According to clinical history, the glioblastomas analyzed in this study consisted of 146 P-GBLs and 4 S-GBLs. Immunohistochemical expression of EGFR, p53, and IDH-1 was observed in 62.6%, 49.3%, and 11.1%, respectively. Immunohistochemical profiles of EGFR(+)/p53(-), IDH-1(-)/EGFR(+)/p53(-), and EGFR(-)/p53(+) were noted in 41.3%, 40.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. Expression of IDH-1 and EGFR(-)/p53(+) was positively correlated with young age. The typical immunohistochemical features of S-GBLs comprised IDH-1(+)/EGFR(-)/p53(+), and were noted in 3.6% of clinically P-GBLs. The combination of IDH-1(-) or EGFR(+) was the best set of immunohistochemical stains for identifying P-GBLs, whereas the combination of IDH-1(+) and EGFR(-) was best for identifying S-GBLs.

Conclusions

We recommend a combination of IDH-1 and EGFR for immunohistochemical classification of glioblastomas. We expect our results to be useful for determining treatment strategies for glioblastoma patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cutaneous Melanoma and Glioblastoma Multiforme Association—Case Presentation and Literature Review
    Olguța Anca Orzan, Călin Giurcăneanu, Bogdan Dima, Monica Beatrice Dima, Ana Ion, Beatrice Bălăceanu, Cornelia Nițipir, Irina Tudose, Cătălina Andreea Nicolae, Alexandra Maria Dorobanțu
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(6): 1046.     CrossRef
  • Primary Extra-axial Glioblastoma: Case Report and Literature Review
    Baraa Dabboucy, Philippe Younes, Abdallah Rahbani, Elie Fahed, Gérard Abadjian
    Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery.2021; 40(04): e368.     CrossRef
  • TERT Promoter Mutation in Adult Glioblastomas: It's Correlation with Other Relevant Molecular Markers
    Mukesh Barange, Sridhar Epari, Mamta Gurav, Omshree Shetty, Ayushi Sahay, Prakash Shetty, Jayantsastri Goda, Aliasagar Moyiadi, Tejpal Gupta, Rakesh Jalali
    Neurology India.2021; 69(1): 126.     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemical characterisation and histopathology of astrocytic neoplasms at a tertiary Nigerian hospital
    Michael Nweke, Gabriel Ogun, Amos Adeleye, Clement A. Okolo, Adekunle Adesina
    International Journal of Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cytotoxic Effects of Blue Scorpion Venom (Rhopalurus junceus) in a Glioblastoma Cell Line Model
    Laura A. Lozano-Trujillo, Diana K. Garzón-Perdomo, Andrea C.R. Vargas, Lina M. de los Reyes, Marco F. Avila-Rodriguez, Olivia T.G. Gay, Liliana F. Turner
    Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology.2021; 22(5): 636.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Subgroups of Glioblastoma– an Assessment by Immunohistochemical Markers
    Ádám Nagy, Ferenc Garzuly, Gergely Padányi, Iván Szűcs, Ádám Feldmann, Balázs Murnyák, Tibor Hortobágyi, Bernadette Kálmán
    Pathology & Oncology Research.2019; 25(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Proteomic Advances in Glial Tumors through Mass Spectrometry Approaches
    Radu Pirlog, Sergiu Susman, Cristina Adela Iuga, Stefan Ioan Florian
    Medicina.2019; 55(8): 412.     CrossRef
  • Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutant glioblastomas demonstrate a decreased rate of pseudoprogression: a multi-institutional experience
    Homan Mohammadi, Kevin Shiue, G Daniel Grass, Vivek Verma, Kay Engellandt, Dirk Daubner, Gabriele Schackert, Mercia J Gondim, Dibson Gondim, Alexander O Vortmeyer, Aaron P Kamer, William Jin, Timothy J Robinson, Gordon Watson, Hsiang-Hsuan M Yu, Tim Laute
    Neuro-Oncology Practice.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Calvarium mass as the first presentation of glioblastoma multiforme: A very rare manifestation of high-grade glioma
    S. Taghipour Zahir, M. Mortaz, M. Baghi Yazdi, N. Sefidrokh Sharahjin, M. Shabani
    Neurochirurgie.2018; 64(1): 76.     CrossRef
  • Malignant Gliomas as Second Neoplasms in Pediatric Cancer Survivors: Neuropathological Study
    Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska, Ewa Bien, Joanna Stefanowicz, Edyta Szurowska, Ewa Szutowicz-Zielinska, Magdalena Koczkowska, Dawid Sigorski, Wojciech Kloc, Wojciech Rogowski, Elzbieta Adamkiewicz-Drozynska
    BioMed Research International.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of mutant IDH1, CD133, and β-catenin immunohistochemical expression in glioblastoma multiforme
    Azza Abdel-Aziz, Mie A. Mohamed, Dina Abdallah, Fatma M.F. Akl, Ghada E. Eladawy, Ahmed N. Taha, Hossam Shata
    Egyptian Journal of Pathology.2018; 38(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • On glioblastoma and the search for a cure: where do we stand?
    John Bianco, Chiara Bastiancich, Aleksander Jankovski, Anne des Rieux, Véronique Préat, Fabienne Danhier
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.2017; 74(13): 2451.     CrossRef
  • Development of Glioblastoma after Treatment of Brain Abscess
    Hiroaki Matsumoto, Hiroaki Minami, Shogo Tominaga, Yasuhisa Yoshida
    World Neurosurgery.2016; 88: 686.e19.     CrossRef
  • Clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic prognostic factors in adult patients with glioblastoma
    N. V. Lobanova, L. V. Shishkina, M. V. Ryzhova, G. L. Kobyakov, R. V. Sycheva, S. A. Burov, A. V. Lukyanov, Zh. R. Omarova
    Arkhiv patologii.2016; 78(4): 10.     CrossRef
  • Concordance analysis and diagnostic test accuracy review of IDH1 immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma
    Jung-Soo Pyo, Nae Yu Kim, Roy Hyun Jai Kim, Guhyun Kang
    Brain Tumor Pathology.2016; 33(4): 248.     CrossRef
  • Methyl Guanine Methyl Transferase Methylation Status and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor expression in a cohort of Egyptian glioblastoma patients
    Soheir M. Hamam, Bassma M. El Sabaa, Iman M. Talaat, Rasha A. Nassra, Doaa A. Abdelmonsif
    Egyptian Journal of Pathology.2016; 36(2): 282.     CrossRef

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine